I have never given nor witnessed a
birth although I have had many discussions with women who have. One of my favorite birthing stories comes
from a friend’s mother; she’s an American
woman who gave birth to five children while living in Chile in the 1970’s. Her birthing and child-rearing stories have
often been humorously discussed at family gatherings because of their
intensity. While living in a rural area
of Chile, she described going into labor pains and waking her husband in the
middle of the night. He was so shocked
by the news that he ran out of the house naked to get help from the
neighbor. By the time he returned, she
was holding their son in the sheets of the bed; she had managed to give birth
alone to a healthy baby boy with the aid of a small hand mirror—that’s right,
no drugs, no doctors, no nurses or midwives, just a hand mirror. During subsequent childbirths, she labored so
quickly that her older children were called to assist in the birthing process. As they tell the stories now as adults, it’s
often accompanied with grimacing facial expressions, but I’ve often wondered if
participating so closely in the birthing process had, in fact, bonded these
siblings in a very special way. I’ve
also wondered if this type of home-birthing practice was common in Chile both
then and today.
As I began to research birthing
practices in Chile, what I discovered was quite the opposite. An article published in The Lancet entitled, “Health sector reform and the rise of
caesarian births in Chile”, states “National
statistics suggest that Chile has outstripped Brazil in having the highest
reported caesarean section rate in the world” (Murray & Pradenas, (1997). Wow. How
and why did this happen? It seems the biggest contributing factors are the
restructuring of the heath care system financing by creating a private health
insurance system separate from the national health fund as well as the risks
doctors are facing with malpractice suits.
As more privatization of heath insurance occurred, as well as changes to
the national health fund, more C-sections are being performed as a result. Another hint toward this reasoning comes from
a “Chilean forum in English for Gringos, Expatriates, and Travelers to Exchange
Ideas and Information about Chile, South America” at AllChile.net,where one
woman describes the risks and consequences facing doctors in the country. Kel
writes that one, “should
also know that in Chile, when a doc has a bad outcome, he can be taken to
court. The result may not be just an award of money to the Plaintiff but the
judge can send the doc to Jail. As a result many private docs require patients
to sign away the right to sue for a bad outcome. Who can blame them for not
wanting to go to jail? Its also a powerful incentive to practice on the conservative
side.” C-sections are also easier
to schedule and complete leaving doctors with more time to include more
patients in their practice. This seems
to be a cautionary tale. As the article
points out, “Privatisation
and the opening up of choice in maternity care seem to have resulted in more
surgical intervention at birth. As many countries plan changes in their health
care financing, the experience of Chile should stand as a timely reminder that,
whether intended or not, shifts in funding have the potential for enormous
impact on health care practices and behaviours”
(Murray & Pradenas, (1997).
As modern women around the world continue to debate the pros
and cons between natural and surgically
assisted child births, I realize there are many choices to consider each one
weighted with family values, culture, and education. However I also wonder about the women who don’t
get a choice. Was my friend just lucky?
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62208-8
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)62208-8/fulltext
http://www.allchile.net/chileforum/topic1183.html
Hi Angie,
ReplyDeleteI find your post very interesting. I was surprised to read in the textbook "The Developing Person Through Childhood" that more than half of the babies born in Brazil are delivered by c-section and that the rates of cesarean sections in Latin America are higher than that of the U.S. (Berger, 2012). After reading your post, I understand a little more about why that might be. The personal story that you shared about a family friend reminds me of when my younger brother was born. The labor was progressing too quickly for my parents to get to the hospital, so my dad delivered the baby at home with the doctor on the phone. I can't imagine what that must have been like for my parents! Great post. Thank you for sharing.
-Mary
Hi Angie,
ReplyDeleteIt so nice to be in class again with you. I enjoyed reading your post today. Here in the United States I hear more and more about people having their baby by C-Section. Do you think that is because of the increase in technology and doctors can see more inside the stomach of the women?
I could not even imagine what went through your friends mothers mind while having her child alone. I can not believe all she used was a hand mirror. Also what a great connection and learning experience those siblings had. I also hear about more and more parents not making it to the hospital in time. With in the last few months there were articles in the paper about parents having babies on the side of the road. Truly amazing on how things happen.